By: Paul Goldberg – Senior Correspondent | LGBT Politics USA News
JACKSON, MS — (July 7, 2017) — The same-sex marriage legal battle continues over a Mississippi law that allows merchants and government officials use their religious beliefs to deny services to same-sex couples. Attorneys filed a brief Thursday asking the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to block this outrageous law.
Legal experts say it’s the broadest religious-objections law enacted by any state since the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in 2015. The law pushed and signed by Republican Gov. Phil Bryant in 2016 protects the following three beliefs:
1. Marriage is only between a man and a woman
2. Sex should only take place in such a marriage
3. A person’s gender is determined at birth and cannot be altered.
Related LGBT Politics News on JRL CHARTS:
• Trump Inflation Approval Ratings Collapse, Pollster Says Data “Broke the Scale”
• Trump FY2027 Budget Proposal Draws Criticism Over LGBTQ+ Program Cuts
• Tennessee Passes “Charlie Kirk Act” Targeting Campus Protests Over Anti-LGBTQ+ Speakers
• Project 2025 Already 50% Complete: Inside Trump’s Plan Reshaping America
• U.S. Banking Rule Ends ‘Reputational Risk’ Barrier, Expands Access for Legal Businesses
• LGBTQ Corporate Participation Plunges 65% in 2026 as DEI Retreat Reshapes Business Landscape
Attorneys for a dozen gay and straight plaintiffs who sued the state over this law said in court papers Thursday that they are ostracized by the law, which started as House Bill 1523. “HB 1523 is offensive to the rights of LGBT and other dissenting Mississippians and to the Supreme Court’s command on this burning civil rights issue,” they wrote.
The law would allow clerks to cite religious objections to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and would protect merchants who refuse services to LGBT people. It could affect adoptions and foster care, business practices and school bathroom policies.
Back in July 2016, U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves blocked the law from taking effect, ruling it unconstitutionally establishes preferred beliefs and creates unequal treatment for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.
An appeals court panel lifted the hold on the law June 22, saying people who sued the state had failed to show they would be harmed. Plaintiffs want the whole appeals court to reverse that decision.
The panel did not rule on whether the law violates the constitutional prohibition on government establishing favored religious views. The panel said plaintiffs failed to prove they would be harmed by the law, “but the federal courts must withhold judgment unless and until that plaintiff comes forward.”
Stay with JRL CHARTS LGBT Politics USA News for in-depth reporting on the courts, civil rights, and the legal battles shaping America’s future.
// Affiliate Disclosure: JRL CHARTS is a digital news and media platform. We do not host, stream, or sell adult content. Some outbound links may contain affiliate tracking to licensed studio-owned platforms (e.g., LatinBoyz, AEBN, BiLatin Men). These links lead to legal, age-gated distributors and are provided strictly for editorial and informational purposes only.
