By: Paul Goldberg, Senior Editor | JRL CHARTS – LGBT Politics
WASHINGTON, D.C. — (October 8, 2025) — Former President Donald Trump ignited new controversy Wednesday after boasting that his administration “took the freedom of speech away” while pushing for a one-year prison sentence for Americans convicted of burning the U.S. flag.
Related Coverage Links on JRL CHARTS:
• Get the Latest in LGBT Politics USA Exclusively on JRL CHARTS
• Breaking Military News involving LGBTQ Service Members and Security
• LGBT Politics Europe – Updates on Hate Crimes, Judicial Rulings
• Stay Up to Date on the Happenings in LGBT Politics Asia
The remarks came during a White House press appearance focused on “Antifa” and domestic terrorism, where Trump claimed that punishing flag burning was necessary to prevent riots.
“We took the freedom of speech away because that’s been through the courts, and the courts said you have freedom of speech,” Trump said. “But when you burn a flag, it agitates and irritates crowds — on both sides — and you end up with riots. So we’re going on that basis.”
Trump on flag burning: We took the freedom of speech away pic.twitter.com/eJ9Bb36rcy
— Acyn (@Acyn) October 8, 2025
Supreme Court Has Repeatedly Ruled Flag Burning Is Protected Speech
Trump’s claim flies in the face of decades of constitutional precedent. In Texas v. Johnson (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that burning the flag is a form of symbolic political expression protected under the First Amendment.
The ruling stemmed from Gregory Lee Johnson’s protest outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, where he burned a flag to condemn Reagan-era policies. Justice William Brennan, writing for the majority, affirmed that “the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.”
Even conservative icon Justice Antonin Scalia sided with the majority, reinforcing that constitutional rights must protect unpopular speech as much as popular speech.
Legal Experts Slam Trump’s Remarks
Legal scholars and civil rights groups immediately blasted Trump’s claim as both dangerous and unconstitutional, noting that no administration can “take away” free speech without violating the Bill of Rights.
“Flag burning has long been ruled protected speech. The notion that a president could ‘take that away’ shows either profound misunderstanding or disregard for constitutional law,” said one First Amendment expert reacting on X (formerly Twitter).
Advocacy groups across the political spectrum—from the ACLU to the Human Rights Campaign—warned that such rhetoric further erodes democratic norms and signals renewed hostility toward civil liberties.
Why This Matters for LGBTQ and Civil Rights Advocates
Trump’s framing of free speech as optional government policy alarmed civil rights advocates, particularly in the LGBTQ community, which has historically relied on free expression to advance equality and protest discrimination.
Analysts warn that normalizing limits on speech could open the door to broader censorship, from Pride flags and political protest signs to journalistic reporting critical of government policy.
Follow JRL CHARTS for ongoing coverage of 2026 Election cycle politics, LGBTQ rights, and the latest in U.S. free speech battles.
Media Partners: For licensing inquiries, media usage rights, or republication requests, please visit our Contact Us page. All content © JRL CHARTS Media Network. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
- Mutual Massage 2: ASGMax Sets Street Date for Its Steamiest Release Yet! - October 8, 2025
- Trump Boasts: “We Took Away Freedom of Speech” While Pledging Prison Time for Flag Burners - October 8, 2025
- Pornhub Makes Major Announcement: Criminal Background Checks Coming for All Content Creators - October 7, 2025
Affiliate Disclosure: JRL CHARTS is a digital news and media platform. We do not host, stream, or sell adult content. Some outbound links may contain affiliate tracking to licensed studio-owned platforms (e.g., LatinBoyz, AEBN, BiLatin Men). These links lead to legal, age-gated distributors and are provided strictly for editorial and informational purposes only.